It is argued that humanity is supposed to decrease the use of natural materials
instead
of focusing on recycling. I agree with that statement, because the Linking Words
process
of converting existing products is not fully sufficient and, in some cases, Use synonyms
this
Linking Words
process
is not feasible.
Every kind of technical change is connected with some lost. Use synonyms
That is
why we are not capable of recovering 100 % of every component which was used in the manufacturing Linking Words
process
. That happens, when we grapple with recycle of paper. After its production, we can’t receive from Use synonyms
this
the same material. The only thing we can get from it is, Linking Words
for instance
, toilet paper Linking Words
instead
of clean, white paper, which it used to be.
In some cases, changing the form of created product is impossible or is combined with environmental damages. Linking Words
This
means that after their implementation, some resources neither can be used again, nor destroy, they simply stay on our planet and cause a pollution. The best example is plastic. People are not able to deal with its utilization, Linking Words
although
we keep producing a plenty of things, which contain polymers. Other examples are radioactive substances that we implement in atomic power plants. We are not able to stop their radioactivity, what has negative impact on our habitat.
In conclusion, we ought to pay more attention to decreasing the use of the nature, natural deposits than to their reusing, because not only we always lose something during the recovery Linking Words
process
, but sometimes we are powerless when it comes to the change of something, what was once produced.Use synonyms