some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government. However, others argue that they should be funded by non-government sources (e.g. Business, scholarships, etc). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is claimed by some individuals that the government should provide financial and private sectors should provide financial

support

to the sports

player

of domestic level. I totally agree with

this

notion because it helps to provide better facilities to the

player

and raise awareness among the new generation. There are many reasons to

support

the above notion.

First

of all, sponsoring money to the

player

to help them buy expensive equipments and other essential tools, which can be used in their training to enhance their game performance.

Secondly

, financial sport

also

propel

player

to show their game worldwide, which may help to improve the reach of their team and the nation.

Thirdly

, better sports facilities

also

motivate youngsters to take participate in various games.

Hence

, interest towards sports abstain them from bad activities.

Such

as, drugs and criminal activities.

Furthermore

, in the case of women's

player

,

support

from regime help them to show women power and a chance to get equality in their society.

For example

, in Nepal, the government spends huge amount of revenue on women games to provide the equal treat as men as from their society.

Last

but not least, cooperator sectors can

also

advertise their brand to stem their sale.

For example

, according to statics OPPO, a mobile company sponsored IPL every year in India, is improving their sales by 90%. To conclude- financially

support

to the

player

provide them a better type training and spread awareness. I believe

this

is the better way to boost the economy of a sector.