In some countries today, there is an attitude that ‘anyone can do it’ in the arts – music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated. Do you agree or disagree?

Art is a sound from within that people express in multiple forms. It is often argued that the outlook of ‘anyone can become artist’ – in arts

such

as music, literature, acting and art, leads people who lack

talent

to become wealthy and popular. While the others who really possess the

caliber

a degree or grade of excellence or worth

calibre

calipers

are not being appreciated. I totally disagree

to

Suggestion

with

this

and believe that the everyone has a

talent

in

arts

Suggestion

the arts

, whether that

talent

remains hidden longer or gets exposed sooner. To oppose

this

,

firstly

, I think that becoming wealthier or richer is the by-product of the qualities

one

possesses and cannot come without possessing the capability. It could be the case that the qualities do not

exposed

Suggestion

expose

for certain reasons, but that cannot be equated saying the person is having

dearth

Suggestion

a dearth

of

talent

.

For example

, the very well-known voice now, was rejected almost 10 times by All India Radio

station

Suggestion

stations

then

.

Later when

Accept comma addition

Later, when

his

talent

was recognized, he not only earned fame and money but

also

respect in society.

Hence

, saying ‘no

talent

’ is absolutely wrong since

talent

is quite a subjective word and everyone has it in

one

or the other form. To defy

further

, I put forward the

second

reason as the recognition of

one

sets

Suggestion

set

no boundary to the other to get valued. Even if a less skilled person earns the rewards earlier, that doesn’t mean the chances of the more skilled reduce as the field of art is vast enough to accommodate any and every kind of

talent

.

For example

, people have accepted hundreds and thousands of writers, poets, singers, painters, irrespective of number of artists, genre of music and different taste of

arts

Suggestion

the arts

.

Therefore

, only the sky is the limit for arts and popularity or wealth earned by

one

has no serious effect on the acceptance of other artists. In conclusion, artistic

talent

is a possession that every individual has, that brings to

him

male possessive pronoun

his

wealth and makes him renowned. I strongly disagree that the people who become rich or famous have no talents and their becoming so, puts any restriction on the growth of the others.