Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely believed that the reconstruction of the long-standing architecture is pricey,

therefore

these old buildings should be destroyed and new modernized models should be installed as a replacement. I completely disagree with

this

statement and

this

essay will provide my own opinion with the explanations.

First

and foremost,

although

the multitude of people

hold

Suggestion

holds

the opinion of demolishing of ancient buildings, it will not be beneficial for those countries’ economy. To put it simply, it is evident that tourism forms the bulk of the budget and what attracts tourists is the monument which came from heritages.

Therefore

, it is claimed that governments should not knocked down old buildings,

on the contrary

, they have to preserve them from all possible dangers. In

this

case, more visitors will

travel these places

Suggestion

travel to these places

because of the old architecture and increase a total of income.

Secondly

, except monetary sides, these ancient places are the history of those countries.

In other words

, they are one of the outstanding symbols which can illustrate the special traditions and cultures of these areas.

Thus

, the population

have

Suggestion

has

to conserve the long-standing buildings

Moreover

,

although

it can cost much more money, the municipality has to repair all damages on those buildings

instead

of demolishing them and people have to hand them down the posterity in order to save the history. Taking everything into consideration,

although

a plethora of people deem that building modernized infrastructure is better than the restoration of historical buildings, mankind should protect them in order to increase countries’ budgets and saving the history of these places.