It is widely believed that the reconstruction of the long-standing architecture is pricey,
therefore
these old buildings should be destroyed and new modernized models should be installed as a replacement. I completely disagree with Linking Words
this
statement and Linking Words
this
essay will provide my own opinion with the explanations.
Linking Words
First
and foremost, Linking Words
although
the multitude of people Linking Words
hold
the opinion of demolishing of ancient buildings, it will not be beneficial for those countries’ economy. To put it simply, it is evident that tourism forms the bulk of the budget and what attracts tourists is the monument which came from heritages. Suggestion
holds
Therefore
, it is claimed that governments should not knocked down old buildings, Linking Words
on the contrary
, they have to preserve them from all possible dangers. In Linking Words
this
case, more visitors will Linking Words
travel these places
because of the old architecture and increase a total of income.
Suggestion
travel to these places
Secondly
, except monetary sides, these ancient places are the history of those countries. Linking Words
In other words
, they are one of the outstanding symbols which can illustrate the special traditions and cultures of these areas. Linking Words
Thus
, the population Linking Words
have
to conserve the long-standing buildings Suggestion
has
Moreover
, Linking Words
although
it can cost much more money, the municipality has to repair all damages on those buildings Linking Words
instead
of demolishing them and people have to hand them down the posterity in order to save the history.
Taking everything into consideration, Linking Words
although
a plethora of people deem that building modernized infrastructure is better than the restoration of historical buildings, mankind should protect them in order to increase countries’ budgets and saving the history of these places.Linking Words
Ayshan