some people think that prison sentences should not be used in dealing with criminals.Education and jobs,training should be used instead.To what extent do you agree or dis agree.

A few people believe that, offenders should not be punished with jail sentences.

Instead

, they can treated by providing; Education, jobs and appropriate trainings. In my opinion, I don't agree with

this

statement. Indeed, the criminals are highly intellectual, and capable of out-smarting police and other officers. So it's better to increase the intensity of the punishment.

Firstly

, in current trend the burglars are on the verge of technological development.

Moreover

, they are up-to-date with current state-of-the-art facilities, and can give equal competence to the cops.

For instance

, from the beginning itself, they plan with absolute scrutiny

,

Accept space

,

and even alter their plans, with a great foresight.

Therefore

, it is evident that, the criminals are not always the same as they use to be.

Secondly

, brutal punishments and life-sentences are the only ways to mitigate the crime rates.

In addition

to that, rules and constitutions had to be made severe, and

also

the loopholes have to be arrested.

For example

, if a person is accused in a rape case, the imprisonment has to be given abruptly. Once, the respected individual proved guilty with relevant evidence.

Thus

, it leads to the notion that, if punishments don't become fierce,

then

there is no point in thinking about the crime. In conclusion, the old traditional method is always the best, when it comes to punishment.

Furthermore

, it is completely inefficient, to follow the varied sentences.

Lastly

, the consequence has to be intimidating for the offenders, if they try to devise a plan for a crime.