Should governments or teachers be responsible for what is to be taught in schools?

In modern day society, it is essential for a child to be educated in order for him or her to have success later on in life. I believe that it is better if governments are responsible for the subject matter covered in

school

and not the teachers. It is a common goal to supply all children with the same opportunities in life, meaning that the same education should be taught to all children to offer them the same benefits. Naturally, some children will be better at certain subjects than others and will

therefore

obtain a more detailed degree of

knowledge

, yet every child should be taught the same core

knowledge

. Education should provide opportunities, because certain types of education will enable children to pursue certain careers later on in life. Supplying the same

knowledge

is an essential concept, yet it has not been put into action in several countries.

This

raises the question whether or not the children obtain the same degree of intellectual and that the children attending

school

for thirteen years are at an advantage compared to those attending

school

for twelve years.

For example

, in Germany, the syllabus taught depends on the region of the country: in certain regions, children attend

school

for thirteen years and in others for twelve years. The problem,

therefore arises

Accept comma addition

therefore, arises

when the regional regime decides upon what will be taught to students. If teachers had the ability to choose what should be taught to students, the subject matter would become even more complex. The

knowledge

would not only vary between regions, but

also

between schools, providing unfair advantages and disadvantages for certain students. In conclusion, I would argue that authorities should decide upon what is taught in schools, as the situation would become complex if all teachers were responsible for

this

aspect.