Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era, due to the burgeoning population, crime rate

have spiked

Suggestion

has spiked

over the time. It

becomes

Suggestion

has become

a threatening issue for the whole world today. As per the rules of

The great

Suggestion

Greater

britain

a monarchy in northwestern Europe occupying most of the British Isles; divided into England and Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland; 'Great Britain' is often used loosely to refer to the United Kingdom

Britain

and

Austrailia

a nation occupying the whole of the Australian continent; Aboriginal tribes are thought to have migrated from southeastern Asia 20,000 years ago; first Europeans were British convicts sent there as a penal colony

Australia

, the Lawyers cannot access the criminals previous

record

, which covers the

person

from being punished. Certain solicitors have

conjecture

Suggestion

conjectured

that they should be provided with all the evidences of yesteryear.

However

, I completely agree with the given statement, due to various reasons. My agreement would be justified in the subsequent paragraphs. It is irrefutable that a

person

held accused after complete scrutiny of the provided evidences. But in some countries, the jury

do not have

Suggestion

does not have

an access to the criminal previous

record

.

Although

, they have proofs related to the current heinous act of the defendant,

however for

Accept comma addition

however, for

proper understanding related to the

person

, the law agencies should furnish

previous history

Suggestion

a previous history

of an individual for better judgement.

Moreover

, the government should keep the former

record

of every

person

, it would help law enforcement agencies to keep an eye on a

person

who is involved in wicked activities and refrain them

by

Suggestion

from

doing any heinous act. For illustration, the Pakistani government kept all the

record

of Kalbhushan Yadav and when the case went to the international courts, they furnished all the previous criminal

record

of him that strengthen the case against him. In order to recapitulate the topic, it can be said that it is very much imperative for the decision makers to have an access

of

Suggestion

to

all the previous records of the criminals before drafting any decision of the case.