Theme: It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

History is essential for everyone to learn about the

culture

and it is necessary for academic students to learn it. I entirely agree with the view that learning local things is more important than world's for children because it would be helpful to survive in

local community

Suggestion

the local community

local communities

as well as for attachment to local people.

First

and foremost, to learn own play a crucial role to live a better life in

nationas

Suggestion

nation as

every society has some different rituals and believes;

therefore

, everyone knows about them in order to a

mixup

Suggestion

mix up

with society. Local language,

for instance

, is essential to know to communicate with the local community because there are many languages but different regions have their own

ancestor's

Suggestion

ancestors'

language. If children do not know about local things, it will cause problems in the future to understand their own

culture

. Another reason to learn regional

culture

is that children attach to their

culture

if it is taught to them in the classroom. In

this

way, they can learn about

artifact

a man-made object taken as a whole

artefact

buildings and

also

get to know about the sacrifices of elders for areas. According to the report of specialists, children who do not learn about their history in school as a consequence, they cannot inculcate the habit of learning things about the local area. If children know about the importance of historical buildings, they would take initiatives to maintain these old memories. To conclude, it is elucidated that learning history in school is important for children in order to be a prudent person of

nthe

definite article

the

ation

something done (usually as opposed to something said)

action

nation

auction

as well as attach to

culture

.