Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that developed countries should financially support developing countries in times of natural calamities on humanitarian grounds.
This
essay agrees with
this
statement because wealthy countries have the resources and the latest technology to avoid and overcome the damage caused and; it creates harmonious relations between these nations. Needless to say that rich countries have superior medical resources and modern technology, which can help minimize the impact of these natural disasters. It is quite challenging for the government to handle the diseases, casualties, and deaths during a natural catastrophe without the financial aid of well-to-do nations.
Moreover
, wealthy countries can lend a hand to poor countries with the help of their expertise to forecast the calamities beforehand, thereby reducing damage and economic losses.
For instance
, during the 2004 Tsunami, countries like Australia, India, Japan, and the United States formed a coalition to help Indonesia which was badly affected during the aftermath.
Also
, the help offered by the developed nations to the less affluent countries in the hour of crisis will build a healthy
relationship
between them. There is a possibility of a good trading
relationship
which could benefit both the countries in the long run.
In addition
, amicable relations between the countries may help defend each other in case of a security threat from the neighbouring nations. In 2015, Nepal was struck with a sudden earthquake, India offered financial assistance to Nepalese, which helped in creating a harmonious
relationship
. To conclude, poorer countries hit by natural catastrophes should be funded by prosperous nations because economically weak countries lack advanced equipment and financial resources and strengthen their
relationship
.
Submitted by Amruta Bhavdeep on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Humanitarian relief
  • Infrastructure
  • Global solidarity
  • Disproportionately
  • External assistance
  • Rebuilding efforts
  • Disaster response
  • Investment in stability
  • Dependency theory
  • Responsible intervention
  • Paternalistic
  • Shared humanity
  • Sovereignty
  • Capabilities
  • Fatality rates
What to do next:
Look at other essays: