Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In the contemporary world, some groups believe that plenty of

money

and efforts

is spent

Suggestion

are spent

on preserving wild animals, others think that

this

huge amount of

money

should be used for human

life

. While

this

suggestion seems to be reasonable,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

firmly

disagee

be of different opinions

disagree

with

this

statement. On the one hand, some people may think

money

should be consumed more on human population because of the following reasons. Talking about the

first

reason, over the past decades, the population of the earth is rapidly rising

,

Accept space

,

however

,

Accept space

,

the resources in the world

is

Suggestion

are

limited, so people who have to suffer from lack of

money

is at an increasing rate and

this

amount of

money

can assist them in many aspects of

life

.

For example

, each year, millions of people do not have a happy

life

due to their financial problems.

Moreover

,

this

group

want

Suggestion

wants

to spend more

money

on human since they might

wanted

Suggestion

want

to have a better

life

quality, they may do not the see the benefits of protecting animals, they just need to have more

skycrapers

a very tall building with many stories

skyscrapers

and shopping

mails

a public area set aside as a pedestrian walk

malls

in their cities.

On the other hand

,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

strongly disagree with that view for a number of grounds.

Firstly

, look after wild animals not only brings a variety of advantages to the

wildlife but

Accept comma addition

wildlife, but

also

the atmosphere, animals support the atmosphere in stopping the climate changes which can prevent the earth from many serious disasters

such

as drought or melting ice.

For instance

, beavers regulation of waterways can save the earth from floods and forest fires.

Secondly

, i do not support

this

view because in the recent decades, the quality of wildlife is considerably decreasing due to human, so now, they need to have the responsibilities to bring animals home back, if people keep exploiting and do not have any activities which can bring animals certain assistiances

then

one day, in the near future, they will revenge.

For example

, people profit millions of dollars from wildlife each year. In conclusion, many people want to concentrate on giving wild

animals

Suggestion

animal

protections meanwhile others consider that human

life

is a more important factor. In my view,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

think that

this

enormous amount of

money

should be invested in

animals

Suggestion

animals'

animal

preservation than human population.