Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by many people that the increasing

price

of material is the most effective method to

address

worldwide environmental issues.

However

, I tend to believe that it is not the most effective

way

since it may

cause

other problematic issues for the

population

of the

world

.

To begin

with, vehicles are considered one of the major factors leading to environmental problems

such

as

air

pollution. As cars exhaust toxic fumes, they present dire threats to the natural

world

.

Nevertheless

, people are unwilling to stop driving private cars, even realizing the aftermath of the

overconsumption

of

petrol

.

Thus

,

growth

in the

cost

of

fuel

will not cut down global demand for

petrol

in order to eradicate environmental problems.

On the other hand

,

Accept space

,

a

rise

in the

price

of

fuel

can lead to a multitude of difficulties for some countries.

First

of all, it might have an adverse impact on the economy, which will generate challenging circumstances for

population

. As the

cost

of

petrol

increases, it will

cause

utility bills to

rise

,

such

as electricity, water or gas.

Furthermore

,

Accept space

,

a

growth

in the

cost

of living may pose financial hardships to people, which even can result in the

rise

in the unemployment rate.

Lastly

, rising

fuel

costs can have a detrimental effect on the

airline

industry. It is undeniable that ticket prices and additional fees will

rise

because of the increase in the

cost

of

airline

fuel

. As a consequence, the number of passengers who want to travel by

air

might decrease. To conclude, increasing the

cost

of

fuel

is not the most reasonable

way

to resolve environmental issues. In my opinion, there are some alternative options to

address

environmental problems by raising people’s awareness about

this

global emergency.It is argued by many people that the increasing

price

of material is the most effective method to

address

worldwide environmental issues.

However

, I tend to believe that it is not the most effective

way

since it may

cause

other problematic issues for the

population

of the

world

.

To begin

with, vehicles are considered one of the major factors leading to environmental problems

such

as

air

pollution. As cars exhaust toxic fumes, they present dire threats to the natural

world

.

Nevertheless

, people are unwilling to stop driving private cars, even realizing the aftermath of the

overconsumption

of

petrol

.

Thus

,

growth

in the

cost

of

fuel

will not cut down global demand for

petrol

in order to eradicate environmental problems.

On the other hand

,

Accept space

,

a

rise

in the

price

of

fuel

can lead to a multitude of difficulties for some countries.

First

of all, it might have an adverse impact on the economy, which will generate challenging circumstances for

population

. As the

cost

of

petrol

increases, it will

cause

utility bills to

rise

,

such

as electricity, water or gas.

Furthermore

,

Accept space

,

a

growth

in the

cost

of living may pose financial hardships to people, which even can result in the

rise

in the unemployment rate.

Lastly

, rising

fuel

costs can have a detrimental effect on the

airline

industry. It is undeniable that ticket prices and additional fees will

rise

because of the increase in the

cost

of

airline

fuel

. As a consequence, the number of passengers who want to travel by

air

might decrease. To conclude, increasing the

cost

of

fuel

is not the most reasonable

way

to resolve environmental issues. In my opinion, there are some alternative options to

address

environmental problems by raising people’s awareness about

this

global emergency.