The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Giving harsh punishment to the lawbreaker of
road
rule is the only method to protect from accidents.
However
, I disagree that stricter retribution for violating the law is merely
solution
Suggestion
solved
.
Accept space
.
There are many other ways to increase
road
safety.
First
of all, drivers alone are not responsible for
road
accidents as many factors play role in causing harm. Obstacles and sharp curves are the main problems faced by drivers in some areas. Due to which, law-abiding drivers
also
make mistakes. So, severe trial is not appropriate In these types of cases. Government should carefully investigate the reason for mishaps in accident prone areas.
For example
, In India, a research shows that about 60 % of
road
incidents are due to sharp curves and poor condition of roads. 
Secondly
, Extreme weather conditions are another element accelerating the transport issues. Areas which are prone to dense rainfall are the red zone. It is very hard to see anything in these Circumstances which results in car crashes. So, sanction is futile in these cases.
Moreover
, in hilly regions, even the experts face many complications on the
road
and ends with making mistakes. To illustrate, In India accidents is 80% higher in Mountain areas like Jammu and Kashmir as compared to plain region.
On the other hand
, offenders who break laws knowingly should be punished strictly. Driving while drunk is a serious crime as they put other’s life at risk
also
. If the police caught driving with some kind of drugs and alcohol, the person should be penalized and if offend the same imprisonment is the better way to control offending. In conclusion, harsh punishments for accidents due to natural calamity and poor infrastructure is injustice. While, retribution for knowingly wrongdoing is must to save people.
Submitted by Divya verma on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • deterrent
  • infractions
  • harsher penalties
  • over-policing
  • driver education
  • automated traffic enforcement
  • holistic approach
  • disproportionately
  • legal representation
  • substance abuse
  • awareness campaigns
  • road infrastructure
  • legal measures
  • traffic regulations
What to do next:
Look at other essays: