The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Giving harsh punishment to the lawbreaker of

road

rule is the only method to protect from accidents.

However

, I disagree that stricter retribution for violating the law is merely

solution

Suggestion

solved

.

Accept space

.

There are many other ways to increase

road

safety.

First

of all, drivers alone are not responsible for

road

accidents as many factors play role in causing harm. Obstacles and sharp curves are the main problems faced by drivers in some areas. Due to which, law-abiding drivers

also

make mistakes. So, severe trial is not appropriate In these types of cases. Government should carefully investigate the reason for mishaps in accident prone areas.

For example

, In India, a research shows that about 60 % of

road

incidents are due to sharp curves and poor condition of roads. 

Secondly

, Extreme weather conditions are another element accelerating the transport issues. Areas which are prone to dense rainfall are the red zone. It is very hard to see anything in these Circumstances which results in car crashes. So, sanction is futile in these cases.

Moreover

, in hilly regions, even the experts face many complications on the

road

and ends with making mistakes. To illustrate, In India accidents is 80% higher in Mountain areas like Jammu and Kashmir as compared to plain region.

On the other hand

, offenders who break laws knowingly should be punished strictly. Driving while drunk is a serious crime as they put other’s life at risk

also

. If the police caught driving with some kind of drugs and alcohol, the person should be penalized and if offend the same imprisonment is the better way to control offending. In conclusion, harsh punishments for accidents due to natural calamity and poor infrastructure is injustice. While, retribution for knowingly wrongdoing is must to save people.