Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Unarguably, leisure is an indispensable part of living in

this

competitive and materialistic era. The lion’s share of people favours that possessing luxurious lifestyle has advantages,

however

, others adverse it. In my perspective, getting free

time

is highly recommended in order to live a happy and meaningful life.

This

essay will decipher the effects with few standpoints. On one hand, people believe in working hard to get lavish lifestyle, including a bungalow, an extravagant car, branded clothes and electrical apparatus, which make them more happy rather than getting more free break. Though, there is nothing wrong to get plentiful currency in the current situation of the globe, since the social influences drive youngsters to crave for world tours and the affluent parties.

In addition

,

for instance

, a child who grows in poverty is always dreaming about having more property rather than spare-

time

and the reason behind

this

can be an inferiority complex or competition. In the controversy,

however

, I opine that health is wealth and a few sections of society have been seeing a disastrous effect of having money but no fitness. To explain in detail,

for example

, a person from a rich family who has abundance wealthy materials from service to product still cannot cure the mental conditions like depression and loneliness. On top of that, recreational activities lead a happy life by spending quality

time

with one’s dear and near ones.

Moreover

, free

time

on weekends, especially, has been noted as a stress buster and an individual can get more energy for

next

week. To recapitulate,

this

can be seen clearly from the above mentioned detail that money can buy everything but not the health which means society should accept the concepts of having a quality

time

to pursue interests as well as hobbies.