In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Since the inception of urbanization, the public transportation system has garnered a great deal of publicity

becaUse

for the reason that; on account of

because

of its rational role. Amid a myriad of public vehicles, the express

train

is the potential candidate to help

inhabitants

Suggestion

the inhabitants

to adapt to

this

increasingly rapid living pace. Notwithstanding its unquestionable benefits, it still engenders some valid concerns about the colossal cost spent on railway lines in

favor

promote over another

favour

of public transport at present. On the one hand, the express

train

has been determined as the elemental precursor of economic growth by a host of culprits. Japan, an economic powerhouse, perfectly exemplifies

this

notion. Japanese express

train

, so-called as “Shinkansen”, makes dwellers quickly gain access to the different prefectures in the recorded rate with AT a reasonable cost.

Moreover

, it exerts the far-reaching effects on the economic outlook of the areas around stations by the development of

derivate

formed or developed from something else; not original

derived

business models,

such

as restaurants and souvenir shops. Economic benefits aside, it would address one of the most popular pressing issues, traffic congestion. The considerable volume of the

train

is conducive to transferring the vast number of passengers in one route;

hence

,

this

convenience can urge them to forego their vehicles.

On the other hand

, an opposite school of calls the questions on how

to make

Suggestion

making

the most use of the current public vehicles. It would be imprudent to downplay their role when only the modest budget is adequate to upgrade their state and resolve some immediate issues.

In addition

, the existing transportation system have  HAS been designed based on the condition of city;

thus

, their slight modification may not require the significant change in the urban planning which can cause, in  TO a certain extent,

risks

Suggestion

the risks

of social issues and troubles to citizens.

In contrast

, in case of building the fast

train

, the government definitely spends a huge effort to tackle

this

issue. In conclusion, while the construction of the novel railway lines seems to be a massive undertaking of the economy in some cities and leads to the inefficient usage of the existing system, I would contend that the fast

train

is the necessary step towards the metropolis with a thriving economy.