Some people think that resources should be spent on protecting wild animals, while others think those would be better used for the human population. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Whereas some individuals advocate that investments should be applied to preserve our fauna, others claim that the right thing to do is to put

this

effort to protect humans. Even though I recognized both views, I still think that these animals have an important impact on our quality of life,

hence

, by protecting them we will be saving our lives as well. In a world where the environment is suffering from humans' wrong actions, there are still those who defend that it needs to be protected. Since we are part of nature, it is clear our direct connection with it,

thus

, if the fauna is not healthy, we will suffer the consequences.

For instance

, if a wild animal gets sick and contaminate a cow, it can affect us as we eat its meat. As we can see, we are part of a chain, for

this

reason, it is important to protect the animals.

Nevertheless

, some individuals do not see

this

benefit in human life when the fauna

is protected

Suggestion

are protected

. They have their reasons, as they look around and see how people have been suffering from a lack of education as well as health care,

for instance

. In countries

such

as Brazil and Africa, the population will rather advocate having better investments to protect them

instead

of the environment, as they fell on their skins how is to be fighting to have the minimum to live. It is a complicated debate, which needs to be taken into consideration,

however

, I still consider respect for the environment as a way to reduce part of these problems. In conclusion, despite the importance of taking care of humans, I strongly believe that when we protect the wild animals we are

also

protecting ourselves. It is all connected,

otherwise

, if we take care of only humans, we will not help nature.