Some people believe that it is fairer to assess a student’s ability based on their performance during the whole course rather than giving a formal examination at the end of the course. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Assessing a student’s ability based on his/ her activeness through the whole course is thought to be fairer than evaluating through exams. I agree with

this

view for certain reasons. On the

one

hand, that using exams to determine the student’s capability does have

one

significant disadvantage, being that that form of evaluation might include various either biases or inaccuracies.

For example

, in the case of students who

can not

can not

cannot

handle the pressure in the exam room, they might forget the answer, translating into the result that does not suit their ability.

In addition

, the examination is the method that can only

one

’s knowledge at a specific moment,

therefore

,

hs

Suggestion

h's

us

to

one

extent or another

causes

Suggestion

cause

increases in avoidable inequalities.

However

, I believe the above advantage to be massively outweighed by

one

of gauging through a pupil’s performance during the route. A key point is that the observation method is more flexible since it shows students from different frames and accumulate impression from the whole process.

Furthermore

, thanks to the observation, every hard work will be witnessed, ultimately boosting the motivation of

student

Suggestion

students

the student

to improve their performance. In conclusion, my conviction is that the ability of the student

to be

Suggestion

be

being

fairer when it is evaluated through the performance during the whole process.