Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

It has been argued by many that reducing the number of days of car usage will decrease the air pollution, whereas others believe that there are some other ways to tackle it. I support the latter idea, as the polluted air is not just because of the vehicles, there are multiple factors for

this

Linking Words

like increased deforestation, expansion of cities and industrial growth. On the one hand, there is a belief that the global air index can be cleaned by fixing the international motorcar-free days.

This

Linking Words

will reduce the consumption of oil, thereby producing less smoke.

Secondly

Linking Words

, the heat generated and the temperature of the atmosphere will

also

Linking Words

be reduced.

Moreover

Linking Words

, the rush on the roads will be decreased,

thus

Linking Words

helping the nature to heal.

For instance

Linking Words

, that practice is being followed in the European countries like the Netherland.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, some people are of the view that the environment can be cleaned by planting more trees, using bio-friendly fossil fuel and using recycled materials, and I

also

Linking Words

back the same view. The masses must be educated about the proper disposal of the waste materials.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, the trend of migration towards the cities has to be curbed.

Thus

Linking Words

, these measures are more important than just stopping the modes of travelling.

For example

Linking Words

, the UK officials have taken many steps in keeping the planet green like imposing fines on those who cut the trees. To conclude, I think that a multidisciplinary approach has to be implemented to prevent

further

Linking Words

depletion of the ozone layer and to keep the world Eco friendly.