Some people think the governments should increase the cost of fuel for cars and others vehicles in order to solve environmental problem. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In past years due to environmental issues that we struggled with some measures were taken

such

as boosting the oil and

fuel

price.

This

was a semi impactful step which is believed by some.

However

, I think that to solve the environmental problem

this

measure is not enough. Money related things better called the monetary system always had an impact on society and people because these days mankind is so dependent on money, so increasing material cost or putting financial pressure on people in order to reduce environmental damage seems to be an achievable purpose.

moreover

in addition

Moreover

, when

fuel

cost figures increased not only can we save our world from pollution, but

also

heavy traffics so it can act as a deterrent to car drivers and force them to use public transportation or clean transportation facilities. Despite all the great fact that

this

method brought to the table, there are

also

some downsides which make

this

scheme not fully acceptable. It was mentioned in the

last

paragraph that money is an integral part of our life, but how about the

fuel

itself, we can barely find a factory which starts without fossil

fuel

, so when

fuel

prices are escalating the inflation rises too and inflation results in market disequilibrium.

Furthermore

, we may witness the disappearance of jobs which associated with

fuel

such

as

fuel

production and distribution organizations, taxi drivers.

Consequently

, just by increasing

fuel

costs, we are not able to tackle ecological damages. In conclusion, increasing the cost of

fuel

is an effective way to solve the environmental problem, but if we add something complementary like increasing public awareness about

fuel

consumption the result is going the be superior to before.