Some people believe that it is wrong for professional athletes to compete in the Olympics because their strong financial backing and training give them an unfair advantage over the other athletes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While there are people who support pro athletes taking part in the Olympics, others oppose asserting the fact that their participation might ruin amateur athletes.
However
, I agree that it is unfair to exempt professional athletes from the Olympics despite they are exiled and esteemed. The below thesis will elucidate the above statements with some valid examples. Professional athletes benefit, privilege over other athletes.
This
is so because they earn astronomical salaries and they are masters in their field. In order to achieve
this
position they have come across a long journey that includes rampant training and number of winning tournaments. Being meticulous and adept in their occupation is what counts them as professionals. For
this
reason that they are excellent players and can defeat amateurs, they cannot be exempt from the Olympics. Indeed, their active participation eventually motivates and triggers other athletes to compete. It can be concluded that these kind of exposure enables them to learn from the pioneer Whereas many contemplate that authorities should support amateurs who are trying their luck in the Olympics.
This
is possible by abiding the rule of amateurism in the Olympics. If 10 out of 10 athletes in the Olympics are amateur
then
the chances of winning the game are more,
otherwise
it would be a one sided game professional vs. Amateur.
Consequently
, thanks to
such
competitive holdings they play as a team and for their country, despite the fact that they are paid or not.
Furthermore
, the nation wants young talents to move the baton of sports competitions.
Hence
, considering the above explanation, I conclude, despite all the privileges (fame, high salary , highly trained), skilfull athletes should not be redundant to Olympics and their participation should be considered affirmative because winning a competition might teach to be confident while at the same time loosing the game teaches the person to be composed.
Submitted by Abhijit Bose on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: