Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

In the era of infrastructure and development architectures, many towns create skyscrapers and high rise buildings as an accommodation and some towns build villas and housing community for good living. I am standing by the former view and both the view will be discussed in details

further

. Well infrastructure and lavish properties are famous in developed regions as it's shown talent, creativity and art of their engineers and architectures.

First

of all, Skyscrapers are in trending as it consumes less area.

Hence

, too much agriculture land can be saved from becoming non-farming field and it gives more shelters to people at minimal cost with good living style.

Secondly

, taller buildings are consuming more facilities like a big garden for kids with sea-saw and sliders, swimming pools, gym, club and mini theatre and so on. Apart from that, social activities and events are part of big apartments,

such

as celebration of festivals and sports activities on vacation, it has a direct impact on socializing people with others in a time of technology.

Last

but not the least, famous buildings like Burj Khalifa in Dubai, is honoured and pride of country for their framework, facility and beauty and it attracts visitors, which have direct influence on the economy and business.

On the other hand

, some cities like Toronto and New York has developed a house with parking, backyard and garden in a raw.

However

, it's consumed too much farmland in populated countries like India and China and cost too much money to build houses in the wider area.

Furthermore

, it's

also

creating distance between communities and people as one home is not too close to another. In my opinion, High rise buildings are very convenient and beneficial to the world and government of countries as it has many advantages to housing civilization.