The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The main topic shows the use of nuclear like harms in case of world war, it provides
also
to the
energy
as regards the costs and cleaning. In the world there are some nuclear stations giving
energy
for each
countries
Suggestion
country
,
this
is a good thing where it is not possible create
energy
with alternative like wind turbines
also
because some places do not have the resources. In fact, the use of Nuclear power is very dangerous it has to be monitored constantly or could happen what it is verified whit the explosions of Hiroshima and Nagasaky.
furthermore
in addition
Furthermore
Nuclear technology
make
Suggestion
makes
a lot of pollution and I do know if the earth could still handle
this
for
long time
Suggestion
a long time
.
On the other hand
,
Nuclear station
Suggestion
a nuclear station
a Nuclear station
at the moment it is the only alternative cheap of
energy
productions. As regards the threat of nuclear weapons
agains
in contact with
against
some places, I find difficult to handle because I think that in 2020 all countries should be find an alternative to discuss about eventual problems each others and should not being a blackmail to stay in peace.
For example
, I think that the
dialog
a conversation between two persons
dialogue
to find some alternatives is the best weapon. In conclusion, I agree because nuclear power at the moment gives us the possibility to live in a world where the
energy
it is everything, but
i
refers to the speaker or writer
I
disagree
to
Suggestion
with
the use of Nuclear technology as
arm
Suggestion
an arm
for the reasons that
i
refers to the speaker or writer
I
written
Suggestion
have written
wrote
above, I know that it is simple to say and not to do because not all countries are
ables
(usually followed by 'to') having the necessary means or skill or know-how or authority to do something
able
to talk to solve problems.
Submitted by fede on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Deterrence
  • Mutually assured destruction
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Cost-effective
  • Radiation therapy
  • Proliferation
  • Rogue states
  • Radioactive waste disposal
  • Catastrophic accidents
  • Climate change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: