increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems To what extent do u agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

There is an opinion that raising the cost of fuel is an efficient method to combat the deterioration of the environment, and the overcrowding of vehicles on the road. I agree with

this

Linking Words

viewpoint, since higher petrol prices are likely to discourage people from using private transport,

thus

Linking Words

, reducing the number of vehicles on the road.

As a result

Linking Words

, air pollution can be expected to reach a minimum.

Additionally

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

phenomena would lead to a well-connected public transit system. The rise of oil prices would lead many to minimize the usage of private transport, due to less affordability.

Consequently

Linking Words

, the number of vehicles on the road would decrease, as more people opt for public transportation.

Thus

Linking Words

, air pollution, caused previously, would,

furthermore

Linking Words

, decrease.

For example

Linking Words

, an individual is more likely to ride a bus for $2, to reach his destination, rather than spending $12 just for fuel. Few other effective measures would be to increase prices of maintenance and cost of vehicles.

Moreover

Linking Words

, availability of the license should be limited to the common public.

For example

Linking Words

, an average person is more likely to benefit from the cheap and efficient public transportation system, rather than going through the hassle of receiving a license, and filling huge expenditure costs to purchase and maintain the vehicle,

hence

Linking Words

, increasing their probability to opt for public transit system. To sum up, increasing kerosene prices is a brilliant way to deal with issues,

such

Linking Words

as traffic and air pollution. In my view, it is extremely beneficial in protecting our environment, alongside reducing global warming.