Some people think that large, impressive buildings are important for a city. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some believe that building a landmark for a

city

is a crucial in some good ways. While others insist that a budget should spend on upgrading schools and medical facilities. I will consider both perspectives and conclude with my own opinion.

Firstly

, some cities has kept constructing some remarkable constructions for some reasons. These places play a significant role in a landscape of

city

Suggestion

the city

cities

and showing a representative. The places,

such

as the Tokyo tower in Japan, or Marina-bay-sands hotel in Singapore, those can measure how those countries are a success by remarkable building. People who were attracted by these construction are willing to visit them that contribute to the income of

city

Suggestion

the city

,

hence

This

beneficial movement effect on neighbours retail stores.

On the other hand

, some insist that schools and medical care centre should be focused on more than building more landmarks. In my perspective,

this

is

also

true that a

city

should be a side of caring local facilities. By allocating money into important health facilities, local councils can assure greater access to

such

as those facilities while the astonishing building can only impress tourists.

For instance

, if there happens a severe outbreak disease or natural catastrophes, the work of paramedics and place of giving a medical care will be what humans suffering from those situation truly needed, not largely constructed amazing building. In conclusion, to construct an impressive landmark would be appreciated as gaining money from visitors, but

this

income should be used to enhance local facilities and prepare for disasters.

This

flow of cash can lead a

city

to flourish for good.