Some governments today seek to monitor the general public’s electronic communications (in the form of phone calls, texts, and emails) saying that this reduces crimes. Many people oppose this, however, saying that it erodes individual freedoms. Discuss the aspects of this debate and give your conclusion to the discussion.
#governments #public’s #communications #form #phone #texts #emails #crimes #people #freedoms #aspects #debate #conclusion #discussion
Online surveillance has become a new buzzword in public journals recently. Admittedly, to vox pop, it is an outright fraud and an invasion of privacy; meanwhile, to government agencies, it acts as a shield against national
security
threats. Following this
essay is an analysis of this
trade-off between privacy and security
that hopefully would reach a consensus.
On the one hand, a myriad of problems would crop up once access to personal data was granted to authority. Firstly
, the future of an astronomical amount of information is in the midst of unknown
. Suggestion
the unknown
For instance
, the fact that administration
can penetrate into an individual social network without a hitch proves its vulnerability to hacker attacks, collapsing the idea of Suggestion
the administration
cybersecurity
. Worse still, if fell into the wrong hands, Suggestion
cyber security
for example
, corrupt ministers, confidential data are likely to be sold and exploited by marketing tycoons. Sooner or later, this
type of warrantless
monitor will menace everyone’s life by disrupting promotional calls, irksome pops-up, and littering spam emails. This
scenario is amplified by the mind-blowing revelation from
Suggestion
for
U
.S whistleblower, Edward Snowden, about the impact of monitoring programs operated by NSA (National second person pronoun; the person addressed
you
Security
Agency). Consequently
, objection to pervasive surveillance is understandable.
On the other hand
, authoritarian regimes such
as comprehensive regulation of media use are inexorably paramount to forestall criminal acts in advance. On a national scale, the number of online frauds has decreased dramatically, profoundly due to the exposure of private affairs under oppressive monitoring programs. Also
, in this
age of globalization, the most omnipresent national security
threat is a subversion, which often seems to cloak in off-the-grid networking sites. Accordingly
, to safeguard its jurisdiction, the government has no alternative but to control its residents’ digital footprints. Furthermore
, it is widely acknowledged that only by such
modus operandi can the suppression of terrorism be assured. Indeed, its efficacy has been witnessed since a series of bombs planted in railway stations have been diffused over the past decades. Thus
, it is better off for citizens to surrender their privacy for security
.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the benefits of public surveillance exceed its drawbacks. Hence
, it is highly recommended that citizens should come to term
with the fact that their lives are under constant scrutiny, after all, just for their sake.Suggestion
terms
Submitted by Andy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?