Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about animal experiments served for medical purposes and testing other products' safety. While some disagree with that idea, I would support a limited amount of animal testing for producing medicines. On the one hand, some people find it ethically wrong to experiment on animals. It can be argued that all creatures on the Earth are to be respected with equal opportunities of existence. Opponents of

such

Linking Words

arguments believe that humans have no right to subject animals to unexpected sheer torment as testing on them. A typical example of

this

Linking Words

practice is experimenting with lab mice, which are given an ailment

then

Linking Words

a developing remedy for measuring the effectiveness of that new drug and its side effects. Those mice will suffer possible trauma or even die due to the incompatibility of

tested

Suggestion

testing

drugs.

Therefore

Linking Words

, they believe that the benefits to humankind

can not

can not

cannot

justify the suffering caused, and scientists should use alternatives.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, it seems there are no reliable alternatives to animal experimentation. Exponents of animal testing argue that it is too dangerous to provide humans with newly developed medicines without animal experiments, and a certain amount of torment that mice can bear will justify if a human is saved.

In addition

Linking Words

to that, supporters believe that opponents will change their minds if their relatives are in need of a medical treatment that has been produced through the processes of animal experimentation. From my perspective, I agree with a ban on the use of test animals for non-medical products, but it may be essential to apply that practice for medical developments. In conclusion, it would be unreasonable to stop using animals for the production of medicines until another workable method is available.