Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a sat- isfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion about whether people who accept doing a

job

for a lifetime is seeming to have a greater sense of fulfilment than constantly

job

adjusted ones. In my opinion, I totally agree with

this

point.

To begin

with, certainly pursuing a career for an extended period of

time

could allow people to advance to the top of their chosen career.

In other words

, spending a large amount of

time

in life to do a

job

, people would benefit from

job

prospects, which conclude promotion opportunities and

then

is a generous salary package.

For example

, as a basic regulation, any new employee has to start at the low positions in business to apprentice until they are masters in their field. Because of the long

time

working in the enterprise, these skilful staffs might be offered advancement opportunities, pay raises, and

hence

greater satisfaction.

Besides

, working in a position for a long period of

time

could help employees achieve work-life balance. To be more specific, due to being familiar with their heavy workload,

instead

of being under massive pressure, they could come up with better creative ways to tackle their tasks and minimize workplace conflicts.

Therefore

, they might have more useful

time

to do other things

such

as taking care of their children, opening their circle of friends, and so on. To sum up, I completely believe that people who track a certain career is more likely to gain accomplishment than regular

job

-changing ones.