Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The recession is a challenge and arduous issue for a country, and the question of it is concerned as the most imperative target government it's worth discussing. While some commentators see that other types of process are as important as the economic development. Personally, I am strongly inclined to the view that governments should improve all progresses equally. The perspective of a lot of governments is they should pay attention to the economy progress the most because it impacts on Gross Domestic Product (GDP): if people had potential to acquire products and services, that means the GDP is

grew

Suggestion

growing

, they would help to decrease the social inequality, and drive the recession in the provincial.

On the other hand

, many businesses might be struggled if the economy improves devastated.

On the contrary

, there is the other group: people who against the government's goal argue that the importance of other types of rise is as equal as the goal for an economic success. Citizens should be able to assess well infrastructures

such

as public transportation, education, recreational infrastructure, health, and so on. It can obviously see that other types of evolution connect to the economic progress.

For example

, the Thai government focus on the economic growth and military development solely,

however

, it doesn't develop the country and social inequality of citizens in terms of welfare, life quality, benefits for citizens in every class as much as it should have been. As far as I concerned, I would like to reiterate that the importance of every types of process should be considered equally to the aim of developing homey and improving the quality of people's life because a rustic will be propelled by citizens in a homey, so people are rightfully them to access the benefits which happens because of other types of development as well. These are the reasons why I certainly belong to the latter group, as what I have grained for the experience of the process of economic growth in my bucolic.