In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Plenty of evidence has suggested that frequent

fast-

food

consumers are usually prone to severe health conditions, but its consumption has been perceived to show no sign of decline. It is

therefore

argued that governments should impose a tax increase on

this

product. The advantages of the proposed avenue are questionable though. Advocates of

this

law may argue that high intakes of fast

food

can be attributed to its decent price, so rising its cost would act as an incentive for consumers to abstain from

this

unhealthy diet and strive for a more balanced one. It,

however

, immediately follows that there would be an unsettling shift in the market’s demand, from junk foods

to

Suggestion

with

wholesome ones,

further

increasing the prices for the recommended portions. People would, in turn, hesitate to serve themselves healthy

food

, which means the initial objective could not be fully met.

Furthermore

, even if the tax increase came into force,

fast-

food

retailers would still resort to including the most inexpensive components in their products to bring the cost down to a reasonable level.

This

movement would pose a more serious threat to consumers’ health conditions, as unhealthy yet desirable,

resonably

to a moderately sufficient extent or degree

reasonably

-priced

flavors

the general atmosphere of a place or situation and the effect that it has on people

flavours

and textures could be added to the meals. Sodium’s flavour-enhancing properties,

for example

, which are among favourite ingredients in worldwide

fast-

food

restaurants have been demonstrated to cause hypertension and even kidney-related diseases. In conclusion, even though raising tax on fast

food

is one of the most commonly-discussed solutions in order to cut back on the intakes of

this

kind of

food

, its possible outcome could not justify its repercussions. Despite potentially creating a small reduction in

fast-

food

consumption,

this

implementation would be likely to compromise human health in the long term.