Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which solution is better?

Creating good housing areas

has always been

Suggestion

have always been

a major concern for urban planners. Some cities build taller buildings to accommodate their growing population, while others opt to spread their housing areas out horizontally.

This

essay will explore the advantages of both approaches to decide which one is more appropriate. Expanding vertically is a popular choice in many cities

for

Suggestion

since

there is little impact on the surrounding areas. Many cities nowadays are surrounded by farmland. If we choose the

second

solution, there will be an expansion of urban areas, which means agricultural land will have to be removed or replaced.

However

, these areas are responsible for food production and provision for the region around them, including the

city

itself, meaning that there could be problems with food security. The

second

choice,

on the other hand

,

also

has its advantages. Building higher buildings will certainly increase the population density, which will put a burden on the existing infrastructure of the

city

. As more people move to these housing areas, roadways will be more and more crowded. Public transport systems will

also

be under more pressure. Take Hanoi as an example. In recent years, when an increased number of people relocated to the

city

for better job opportunities, many new apartment blocks, invariably close to the

city

center

an area that is approximately central within some larger region

centre

, were built to meet the housing needs.

As a result

, the traffic problem is exacerbated and buses are always packed with passengers. In my view, the latter approach to urban planning makes more logical sense. Ensuring food security is possible through other means, and can be done by replacing the lost farmland with vertical farming, a solution Singapore has successfully implemented.

This

is much cheaper than building more and wider roads, which is almost impossible since that would mean the

city

has to be rebuilt from the ground up. In conclusion, while building taller building does not influence agriculture, it creates several problems that are difficult to solve.

Therefore

, building houses across a wider area of land, in my opinion, seems more sensible.