The intriguing topic of whether people should work for the same organisation in the entire working life or rather creating some variations and opportunities throughout their career has sparkled a debate where people in society are mired in
this
controversy about their ensuing careers. From my perspective, in
this
dynamic world, both ways have their own uniqueness to assist an individual on their own path to success, but as a long term strategy, choosing to work for different organisations could be the better option. In order to draw an analogy to scrutinize the bone of contention, a holistic analysis will be established on both sides of the spectrum before making a conclusion.
First
and foremost, working for different organizations during a person's service can build a strong sense of adaptation, including customs and traditions, in different environments
hence
broadening their workplace experience. By
this
way, people can gradually accumulate various talents and skills which will be beneficial when working aside with other employees with disparate backgrounds.
Furthermore
, it
also
increases individuality among themselves, which might
then
develop their idiosyncratic traits or talents that will lead them to their aspirations. In a new workplace ambience, it is probable that they will encounter seemingly insurmountable hurdles or sporadic changes in the beginning, but after handling situations in a longer period of time, people will find their plan to forestall unprecedented events or try to accommodate their respective professions.
For instance
, if a medical student opts to work as a surgeon after graduation, they would seek better employment options in hospitals to increase their clinical exposure experience and lifestyle.
In stark contrast, some people think that working in the same organization all their lifetimes can help them reach high professional positions in the same company or having fruitful relations with mutual friends in correlated sectors.
In particular
, Satya Nadella, the head of Microsoft, has been in the same environment for over 25 years, which helped him achieve Microsoft's echelon. Another potential benefit of staying longer in the same company is that it builds up a reputation of dependability. Ascribing to the investments and resources of an employee
a member who is constantly switching jobs or starting new ventures might have difficulty getting new jobs in the future. Others may feel that having esoteric knowledge in the fields is favourable which engenders internal advancement opportunities or even special perks after reaching tenure milestones.
Nevertheless
, they should
also
ask oneself during the settlement: What if there is predilection or ego clashes in the cooperative which hinders your growth? Should there be alternatives by getting in touch with other industries?
In a nutshell, after juxtaposing both views, the merits of going through multiple companies in a career path are likely to take precedence over the other as it can provide more opportunities in the category and invigorate people to experience new paradigms and standards into the bargain.