Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

People may have different views about preserving languages in danger of disappearing used by ethnic groups of people. While many people argue that governments should not spend on saving these languages, I believe that all languages should be protected. On the one hand, there are several reasons why spending on
minority
language protection can be a waste of financial resources.
Firstly
, many people believe that governments' budget mostly constituted by dwellers' contributions through the tax system is used to invest in a wide variety of areas ranging from education, transportation to
defending
Suggestion
defend
, which will benefit all members of society. Owing to that, preserving languages spoken by small groups of people could be a burden on public funds.
Secondly
, some argue that saving
minority
languages should be the responsibility of ethnic groups themselves since
this
might appear to bring few benefits to society as a whole.
On the other hand
, I believe that the national authority should preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is not only referred to as a communication
tool but
Accept comma addition
tool, but
also
is associated with psychic values. It is believed that languages are the backbone of cultural diversity;
therefore
, the disappearance of any
minority
languages would cause the loss of cultural richness, which can make a nation less attractive or identified.
For example
, Vietnam boasts its convergence of fifty-four ethnic groups speaking various tongues
that is
what culturally distinguishes the country with the rest of the world.
Moreover
, many languages used by ethnic communities dating back to thousands of years reveal a treasure of history, which modern scientists would not be able to shine a light on if those languages were not adequately maintained. In conclusion,
minority
languages may not seem to create tangible values to society in the short-term, but they will have positive effects of a country's cultural identity and decoding history in the long run.
Submitted by Andy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: