In some cities, there is less control over the design and construction of new homes and office buildings. People can build in whatever style they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, more and more individuals and companies demand to have a complete control over the design of their residential properties without any interference from the authority. While
this
development serves buildings’ owners greatly, there are several demerits which need to be considered.
To begin
with, lesser control on the buildings’
style
in large cities indeed has some benefits. With the freedom to build personal architectures, individuals are enabled to use their creativity and imagination to create unique and modernized houses which make the cities look incredibly attractive to citizens and tourists.
For example
, a city with different types of houses and office buildings always draws more attention than places that have the same design for all architectures.
Additionally
, giving residents the power to decide their houses’
style
will save a substantial amount of the governments’ revenue. Because people now pay individually for the architects, the authority is released from the budget burden. Unfortunately, despite the aforementioned benefits, there are massive setbacks of
such
a development.
Firstly
, unlike the past when people were forced to apply the same buildings’ design, the residential area of cities will not maintain a
standardization
Suggestion
standard
of houses in the future because each property now has a different
style
.
This
makes the area unappealing to the citizens who are seeking for a settling place.
Secondly
, without any strict control on the construction, there will always a risk of damaging the surrounding architectures.
For instance
, a building may collapse and cause severe consequence if the construction is not carefully supervised by the authority. In conclusion, while letting people decide
style
of their own architectures bring several advantages, its drawbacks are far more
unfavorable
not encouraging or approving or pleasing
unfavourable
to the cities.
Submitted by a0955313835 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: