It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, providing

university

education for a large number of young people has been high on the agenda of many governments. I believe that

this

progress has a wide range of

benefits but

Accept comma addition

benefits, but

also

is improbable.

To begin

with, giving almost all young people access to tertiary education is advantageous for both students and society.

Firstly

, the

university

curriculum offers students the theoretical knowledge and practical skills needed to open the door to better job opportunities in later life.

For example

, teamwork and extracurricular activities can encourage their problem-solving and interpersonal skills.

Secondly

, on the societal level,

university

graduators

receive an academic degree upon completion of one's studies

graduates

constitute a well-qualified workforce, which contributes to an improved quality of life, and a productive and prosperous nation.

However

, the likelihood of implementing

this

plan is slim.

This

is because an increasing number of juveniles presume that they do not need a formal qualification to get a well-paid job.

Instead

, the working environment is more conducive for gaining hands-on experience which helps young people enhance their career prospects. More importantly, not everyone can afford the

university

tuition fee, and a lot of students have to rely on financial support from governments. Even in some developed countries, the authorities cannot allocate ample resources to ensure that most young people have access to

university

without financial burden. In short, higher education is beneficial to both young generations themselves and the community, but to offer it to

most young

Suggestion

younger

people is impracticable.