Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

It is widely argued that every nation should

aim

to produce materials and goods on a massive scale. To a larger extent, I disagree with

this

statement as

this

aim

may a negative impact on the environment.

First

and foremost, a massive production of goods and items may put a high pressure on the

land

. To be more precise, manufacturers may use raw materials and the

land

inadequately to produce more materials, the effects of which will lead to a shortage of resources and erosion of soil.

For example

, in order to harvest crops four times a year,

instead

twice, farmers have to use chemical pesticides, that damage the quality of soil.

Thus

, producing more goods is inappropriate

aim

to achieve

,

Accept space

,

and it can negatively influence the environment in the short and long term.

Besides

, of countries’ primary objective to manufacture more and more goods, it may cause a significant

waste

of materials after its disposal.

As a result

,

waste

of used products will be carried to landfill sites and ocean, that will contaminate the

land

as well as water.

For instance

, many containers of radioactive

waste

were dumped at three ocean sites in the Pacific Ocean, that had a catastrophic effect on marine life.

Therefore

, governments should focus on producing a sufficient amount of goods and materials. In conclusion,

although

many people claim that the main

aim

of every state should be to produce more products and goods, I disagree with

this

point of view as it can put a huge pressure on the

land

and increase the amount of

waste

products.