The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having one language in the world.

In recent times, due to the ease of travelling, tourism has flourished across the globe. English is spoken mainly in the western countries, who have additional spending power at their disposal,

consequently

, tourism has become a major factor of the wide-spread of the English

language

. Many think that

this

trend could eventually make English as the only

language

which is spoken globally, but there are pros as well as cons of

this

outcome. On

o

Add an article

the

show examples

ne hand, having only

one

language

across the world could help us making things truly global.

For instance

, admissions for education across the globe would purely be based on merit, immigration to new countries won't have to be dependent on

language based

Add a hyphen

language-based

show examples

exams. Various factors of entertainment

such

as movies and plays would not have to be dubbed. Collaborations in sciences, arts and medicine would be easier and loss of information in translation would come down to zero.

Thus

, if there would be only

one

language

across the globe we could definitely act united in various fronts of life.

On the other hand

, recognising only

one

language

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

will

also

mean we would lose all the cultural diversity that individual languages hold. Many vernacular forms text cant be translated to English due to the vocabulary mismatch. If we adopt a singular

language

structure, it could

also

be detrimental to the imaginative variance that different cultures bring. Many people would oppose it, as they would view as

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

suppression of their culture and think that their traditions are not being accepted. Conclusively, an English world could be viewed as a dictatorship and would definitely lead to loss of diversity. In conclusion, having only

one

language

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

has its benefits in various places but it

also

wouldn't be fair to not recognise other languages, not to mention the loss of heterogeneity in cultural backgrounds, which currently act as colours in the rainbow of earth.