Some people believe that studying history is very important and we must study the past to understand the present. Others say that it is useless and should not be studied at all. Discuss both views and give your own opinion .

Today

history

is considered as

a

Change the article

the

show examples

main subject in almost every school courses. Is it worth spending time on

history

or not? It is always argued that studying

history

is essential in order to know the past to which, some section of society is in favour while

other

Replace the word

others

show examples

are against believing that it is not at all useful. The subsequent essay will discuss both views before a reasoned conclusion.

To begin

with, human

have

Change the verb form

has

show examples

a tendency to repeat

s

Add an article

the

show examples

ame actions, where talking lessons from

p

Add an article

the

show examples

ast can be helpful to curb the unwanted outcomes. Dictatorship serves as a prime example, usually

Add a comma

,

show examples

all the dictators and emperors have similar

characteristic

Replace the word

character

show examples

traits to change the society, so by knowing past can help identify any

such

behaviour in the current leader and take actions before its too late.

In addition

,

t

Add an article

the

a

show examples

rend can be seen in

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

certain situations

such

as

s

Add an article

the

show examples

tock market, which can be utilized to predict the future in order to have a positive result by minimising losses.

Moreover

, knowledge from

history

tells

b

Add an article

the

show examples

ase and reason

to

Verify preposition usage

for

show examples

every situation happened.

Thus

,

history

enhances

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

productivity by reducing chances of failure. In contemporary, people

also

believe that in today’s fast pace environment, reading

history

might be waste of time and effort. Individuals need to be updated with

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

modern technology and methods in order to coop-up with the cut-throat competition. Getting involved in

history

would not leave space and time for new inventions

as a result

of which upcoming problems could become hard to tackle causing trouble to

f

Add an article

the

a

show examples

uture generation.

For example

, if scientist might not be able to invent new

energy producing

Add a hyphen

energy-producing

show examples

techniques

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

if the were still engaged in traditional methods.

Hence

,

history

could be served as harmful in

such

situations. To sum up

Add a comma

,

show examples

in a nutshell, learning from

p

Add an article

the

show examples

ast can decrease the probability of loss whereas

on the other hand

, it could become a barrier towards creation and innovation. I believe that

history

should be studied to grab knowledge and learn from the errors.