Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There is an argument these days regarding designs of newly constructed buildings in metropolitans. Some would say that the

government

should strictly control the designs while others believe that the financers should have their freedom while selecting their building's design. In

this

essay, we will discuss both views

although

, build plans should be sanctioned by the federal authorities, as by doing

this

more uniform structures could be made and the main aura of a

city

can be kept intact.

To begin

with, many people would believe, if the financers have the full authority to select the designs,

then

many diverse and awe-inspiring structures could be made. To elaborate, in many cases it is observed that some futuristic designs do not get the necessary permissions from the concerned department and the developers are forced to change the plan and end up making very simply looking building.

For example

, while constructing The science

city

, now a prime tourist spot in Kolkata, almost 27 designs were rejected by the

government

due to some safety issues and later that was needed to build with the help of the

government approved

Add a hyphen

government-approved

show examples

engineers only and the residents of Kolkata were deprived of some

next

-gen designs. In a nutshell, financers and developers should have the freedom to build whatever design they want for the sake of the

city

, according to some people's belief. Moving on to the other part, often The authorities' interventions are required to make more sustainable and safe structures along with conserving a

city

's identity. To simplify, the

government

is needed to keep the uniformity of different building structures along with maintaining the main theme of a particular

city

. If every building has different shape and designs,

then

sometimes it disrupts the beauty of a

city

because if there are many haphazard shaped buildings,

then

actually it decreases the beautification index of a

city

. On top of that, the financers may design something which is not appropriate for public safety and the

government

needs to check that.

Additionally

, all cities are mostly different from others and there are some themes associated with it.

For instance

, Jaipur is known as the pink

city

in Rajasthan because of its buildings' colours. To maintain

this

,

g

Add an article

the

show examples

overnment can not give permissions to the financers to paint whatever they want, because that will destroy the heritage. To conclude, financers' made layout may be more futuristic but the

government

should take care of it for maintaining heritage and uniformity. I would suggest that the financers and the

government

engineers should contribute together to make better multi-storied in the future.