Fossil fuels, such as oil, natural gas, are used in many countries, however, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, are encouraged. Is this trend a positive or a negative development?

A particular issue about
energy
use
has raised quite a concern at home and abroad. Some countries nowadays incline to
use
alternative
energy
resources rather than using fossil fuels that can cause a detrimental impact on the environment. In my opinion, it is necessary to discuss the inherent details of both positive and negative sides
then
leading to a plausible conclusion. On one hand, the
use
of clean
energy
contains a range of benefits. For one thing, using clean
energy
can undoubtedly reduce the mass amount of carbon dioxide, since it embeds the characteristic of utilizing recyclable natural resources -either by solar
power
, wind
power
, or even hydroelectric
power
, with these kinds of
alternative
energy
which can relatively decline the emission of greenhouse gases to some degree. For another,
this
practice might lower some detrimental effects on the human body, since modern people have widely be exposed to the harmful atmosphere, which is permeated by greenhouse gases, in a long period, the public has accumulated a myriad of toxin within their bodies.
Nonetheless
, with the
use
of clean
energy
, it is more possible to mitigate those harmful substances and relieve stress that can cause a profound influence on societies.
On the other hand
, those who take the aforementioned beliefs for granted,
however
, are not seeing the whole picture. Despite using
alternative
energy
can lower the number of greenhouse gases,
instead
, they are still kinds of unstable supplies, due to the technology isn't mature enough to provide humans with the sufficient
use
of
energy
, which can lead to possible problems in maintenance.
For example
, solar
power
is a kind of
power
that humans can only help to generate approximately 20% of
energy
rate,
therefore
it is not prolific enough to meet demands.
Additionally
, the practice might trigger some even more harmful repercussions to the environment. Clean
energy
consumes lots of electricity needs,
such
as coal and shale oil, to maintain a steady
energy
generation, not only can these
alternative
energies contribute to exhausting even more air pollution, and can
also
cause catastrophe to the environment in the future. In a nutshell,
although
exploiting recyclable natural resources may seem to be a method to slow down global warming, its negative impacts can run far and wide, ranging from having unsteady supplies to the possibility to trigger even more powerful destruction.
Submitted by a0955313835 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • global warming
  • climate change
  • renewable energy
  • inexhaustible
  • pollution
  • economic growth
  • job creation
  • finite resources
  • boom-and-bust cycles
  • national security
  • dependence
  • politically unstable regions
  • infrastructure
  • intermittency
  • energy storage solutions
  • potential
What to do next:
Look at other essays: