If countries are serious about solving traffic problems, they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

Road congestion is one of the major serious hurdles found in most of the nations.
This
has,
however
,
ensued
Correct your spelling
ensured
show examples
a debate of sorts that
government
should tax private cars heavily for solving traffic problems and provide free or cheap rail travel by using that money or not. To embark upon a discussion, the proponents of the former view argue that increasing number of vehicles have saturated the roads, if the
government
levy taxes to private cars, people will think about alternatives like public transport.
Thus
, the number of cars wandering on the road will be a lot lower.
Besides
this
, the local Council should look at facilitating commuters with the better availability and free or lower rate of public transport like rails or buses with the expanded timetable.
This
policy
also
forces the authorised Institutions to design a better form of the transportation system.
Furthermore
, tax money collected by the public can be used to improve public transport.
For instance
, the
government
can use it to build better roads and well-equipped bus stations and railway Stations. Apart from it,
this
measure gives positive effects to the environment, the air will not be as polluted as that of before and the traffic jam will not occur so frequently as that of before.
However
, the advocates of the latter view deem that some masses are not able to pay taxes because they do not have good jobs and they have not enough money to pay heavy taxes to the authorities.
Secondly
, It is undeniable that automobile industries have absorbed so many employees. As the demand for the motor vehicle decreases due to high tax rate many car companies would reduce their employment number. Eventually,
this
will cause unemployment and hamper the economic growth of the country in the long run. To conclude,
this
measure is worth considering to improve the current situation but before implementing
this
decision the
government
should consider all the possible consequences.
Submitted by kaurrajwant0208 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: