Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some would argue that financial support provided to artists by the state can be used somewhere else, while others think that artists should be supported by the
government
.
Although
such
funds can be invested to improve people's
life
Replace the word
lives
show examples
, I believe that artists should be supported because they do not have a permanent source of income. On the one hand, there are more prominent issues,
such
as health, education, infrastructure etc, which needs
the
Remove the article
apply
show examples
government
funding. Spending tax money to address these issues would provide the benefit to a large portion of
p
Add an article
the
show examples
opulation.
This
would result in an improved lifestyle for the people which, in turn, would help the country's economy to grow in the future.
For example
, in a recent report issued by the World Bank, it is reported that Pakistan's GDP has increased for the
first
time in the
last
20 years after the
government
has invested Rs. 100 billion on education and hospitals in the
last
5 years.
However
, I believe that stopping support for the artists to solve those issues is not a good solution because artists earnings depend on their demand .
On the other hand
, artists,
such
as actors, musicians, painters etc, earn their livelihood because of the talent they possess. As long as their talent is appreciated among the audience, it will allow them to earn their bread and butter.
This
means that they do not have guaranteed income as compared to other professionals working in the corporate world.
As a result
, once their demand decreases, they would start to struggle financially.
For instance
,
last
year, one of the biggest comedians in Pakistan died in his house because he had no money to get the treatment for his disease. I believe that
g
Add an article
the
show examples
overnment should establish some kind of fund through which all artists can be funded. In conclusion, while the state has to provide funding to more important matters like health and education, artists funding should not be stopped because they do not have a fixed income through which they can support themselves.
Submitted by unjilani on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • promote
  • culture
  • creativity
  • economic growth
  • tourism
  • social development
  • personal development
  • merit
  • financial support
  • balanced
  • transparent
What to do next:
Look at other essays: