Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, there are many organisations which help people to survive in their daily life. A major chunk of masses deems that the charitable Institutions should help people without limitation of
country
.
However
, others think paradoxical. Before any firm opinion, I would like to explicate some factors in the support of both. To embark on, over the years, charitable Institutions continue to assist a large number of people. Many folks believe that these corporates should help those people who are in need not only in a
country
where the charity is established even outside of the
country
.
For example
, Africa is known for its being poorest inhabitant continent. According to a survey, the families of
this
country
have deprived of basic amenities
such
as limited food for a day, insufficient water and even some families does not have a house for lives in. Adding to it, their people generally feel financially insecure. They don't receive any help from the organisations and government.
Consequently
, the charitable societies of developed countries should help the poorest countries people in their survival. On the other side, the advocates of the later view argue that there are numerous houses in a
country
in which they are living have struggled in their day-to-day life and it is a social responsibility of the charities to provide aid to those individuals. To instance, many experts claim that, in most developing countries, like India have umpteen families who are living below the poverty line.
Additionally
, several old people who have been evicted from their homes, live on the streets because they cannot work at
this
age, So, their families consider them a burden.
As a result
, people of
this
country
suggest that charity organisations only help those people where the corporation is based. To conclude, in my opinion, charitable corporations should provide help to the resident of a
country
as well as to the folks of poorest countries.
Submitted by kaurrajwant0208 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: