Some cities tackle housing issues by building skyscrapers, while others decide to construct detached houses in the countryside. The
second
solution is better as it helps to increase the quality of life and it can be cheaper.
Linking Words
First
of all, living in a private house can improve the level of human life as they will have Linking Words
an
unlimited access to fresh air and will become healthier in mental and physical aspects. Remove the article
apply
For example
, a private house can include a backyard territory where owners can create a garden with flowers and fruit trees. Linking Words
Moreover
, quite often lakes and forests are located near settlements. Linking Words
Consequently
, village citizens have Linking Words
an
ability to walk there. Change the article
the
Thus
, fresh air, physical activities and easy-going atmosphere make detached houses a better solution.
Linking Words
Secondly
, countryside accommodation can be considered as a cheaper option than a flat in the city as the price of the land in the city Linking Words
center
sometimes can be extremely high and not everyone can allow to buy it. Change the spelling
centre
For instance
, Linking Words
an
accommodation in a big megapolis Remove the article
apply
such
as Moscow is quite expensive and sometimes it is unreal to own it even for the middle-class representatives. Linking Words
Furthermore
, some people have no wish and ability to take a mortgage and prefer to purchase a house which is located a bit far from downtown. Linking Words
Hence
, countryside houses can help people to get a place for living at an affordable price.
To sum up, the decision to construct houses on a wider land area is a better variant as it is affordable almost for everyone. Linking Words
Also
, it increases the quality of life.Linking Words
Diana Vasileva