Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that countries which extend working hours above the average limit are more achieving than nations which work fewer hours.

This

essay disagrees that prolonged working hours are useful, for

this

would affect the employees’ health and adversely affect the economy.

This

essay will discuss the health risks imposed by extra working hours, followed by economic effects. Extending official working hours can be unhealthy for the workforce.

This

is because many employees suffer from stress due to the continuous pressure that they face at their job.

This

may result in stress-related disorders

such

as fatigue and anxiety.

Moreover

, these staffers may not find enough time to spend with their families.

As a result

,

this

would reduce the employees’ productivity, as they would be demotivated and tired to do any effort.

For example

, the economic inflation in Egypt has forced many individuals to work for too long and take two jobs at the same time. As a consequence, many of them are dealing with many health problems. Another point is that when several labourers struggle with psychological issues, they indirectly affect the economy.

This

reason is many employees would need the appropriate medical care to cure the illnesses that had resulted from stressful working conditions.

This

may result in companies spending so much money to cover their medical expenses.

Therefore

, the economy will be negatively impacted. In conclusion, health-related problems reduce the efficiency of so many workers, which in turn affect the economic status of countries which obligates their labourers to work for long periods of time.