"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is incontrovertible that prophylactic initiatives have been playing a superior role to protect mankind against diseases rather than finding remedies for them since the ancient time. The argument whether a nation's financial blueprint should be deflected towards the protective steps from medicaments – has become a moot point. Notwithstanding,

this

disquisition delves into these both standpoints, and

subsequently

will explore my own perspective,

accordingly

. Apparently, the exponents that postulate that pre-emptive operations must get a substantial part of the forecast, and be carried out by the authorities to abbreviate the ailment – have their justification. The rationalization behind their argument might due to the fact that public edification by arranging awareness campaigns can proliferate the importance of hygienic practices in communities;

hence

, the chances of outbreaks of the deadliest illnesses can be diminished to a great degree.

Additionally

, researching methods for therapy may take years of practices and experiments to prove its positive effects;

nonetheless

, it may not find medical care at all. To epitomize, human science has been investigating a perfect therapeutics for malignant illnesses,

such

as cancer, and autoimmune disorders, from the past many decades, but still there are no successful drugs available in the market that can cure the disease completely.

Conversely

, could the ministrations only the best option to make the world health, be absolutely right? Certainly, it follows that some fatal ailments like heart disorder and stroke need spontaneous treatment than allocating on protection.

Moreover

, if a large share of the forecast being designated to find a cure than in a short period of time, a country would have the best control on these kinds of diseases. According to one survey by the Chronicle-Journal, in 2009, 5% of indigenous people in the rural part of Canada died due to lack of emergency facilities in a hospital, where the government could not provide it. To conclude, having explored both vantage points, I am in perfect alignment with the school of thought that maintains that obstructive actions ought to be given priority to enlighten civilians, for the sack of lessening the outspread of disease, and to improve the quality of a healthy environment;

however

, enough statement should be devoted to pivotal treatments for emergency situations, as well.