the preventation of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.

It has been claiming that finding the right cure for illness is the best way to improve public

health

.

However

, providing funds for researching and developing drugs might not always the optimal solution to reduce

health

issues.

This

essay will discuss why I completely agree that there should be more concentration in findings ways that can impede sickness from distributing among people.

Firstly

, the government would save a large amount of money by encouraging people to follow a healthy style and balanced diets

instead

of spending exacerbate funds on treatments that would probably cause people to become more dependent on them.

Hence

, Governments have to invest financially in the methods and practices that can assist in impeding people from getting sick. An illustration to

this

point, hand sanitizer has been considered an effective way to shield people from viruses and bacteria that can cause diseases.

Hence

, allocating funds for protection against

health

issues is more effective in terms of cost-saving. Another reason, to deal with issues surrounding the

health

problems, requiring immediate solutions by tackling the ways that get people sick

instead

of waiting for a long process of developing medicine. Public authorities should finance the campaigns and processes that stimulate people to follow the safety and

health

guidelines for becoming more fitter and active because it enhances their immune system against any major upcoming viruses. To sum up, it is often claiming that prevention is the best route to tackle diseases

instead

of taking drugs

that is

less effective in the long run.