Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer game for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is a popular belief that reading books is more beneficial compared to watching TV or playing computer games for children. While issue is adverse to some extent, it would do more good than harm. Firstly, it is undeniable that books are instrumental in enhancing children’s imagination and critical thinking. Particularly, by reading stories, children have to use their imagination to create a vision and visualize all events described by words in the book. Morever, stories from books will stimulate analyze the plot to work out meaning behind. Consequently, this paves the way for children can facilitate their learning and help them acquire knowledge at school more effectively. Whiout such this practice, a massive repository of knowledge would disapear, so children could lose the source of reliable information to enhance their personal skills. Secondly, reading stories from a book also develops children’s language skills compared to watching TV and playing computer games. Specifically, spending time reading a book, children will be exposed to a wide range of vocabularies as well as sentence structures. As a result, reading books can provide great opportunities for childern to advance their vocabulary level, which can be lead their better writing skills. Admittedly, early exposure to technologies would provide a technological literacy to youngsters dwelling, which is important on digitally embedded reality .Nonetheless, with a wide range of content of the lession, this issue could be addressing. In conclusion, despite some advantages that playing game or watching TV offer to children, I am complety of the fact that the benefit of reading books are more outstanding
Submitted by Andy on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users