Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In recent decades, private vehicle ownership has boomed as car prices have started to go down,
therefore
allowing more individuals to purchase them. Some
people
believe that personal
cars
are the main reason
city
centres
are congested,
hence
they should be prohibited,
while
others argue that
this
idea is impossible. My opinion is that
city
centres
are too crowded and measures should be put in place to restrict access to personal vehicles.
To begin
with, many
people
think that an excellent solution for solving the overcrowding of
town's
Change noun form
town
show examples
centres
would be to stop private automobiles from entering
this
area.
That is
because the air and noise pollution rates are really high, especially
due to
an enormous number of workplaces and business buildings.
In other words
, many employees live in the
city
’s outskirts and commute every day to the centre using their
cars
.
Moreover
, some
city
centres
were built centuries ago and have small and narrow lanes, so traffic jams are more common here than in any other area.
For instance
, cities like Rome, London,
or
Correct word choice
and
show examples
Paris have already introduced measures
for banning
Change preposition
to ban
show examples
private
cars
in order to stop traffic congestion.
On the other hand
, many individuals have the opinion that banning car owners
to bring
Change preposition
from bringing
show examples
their
cars
into the
city
centre is an impossible solution
due to
a lot of difficulties citizens may face. One of the reasons is the fact that a lot of employees live in suburbs and a lot of them do not have public bus routes to use to go to work.
Also
, real estate is really expensive in
city
centres
so some
people
cannot afford to buy or rent an apartment downtown.
For instance
, London rents are so expensive that
people
prefer to commute from nearby cities, like Winchester or Southampton,
instead
of renting a place there.
However
, these difficulties could be resolved if governments and councils introduced new bus services or lowered the high-speed
railways'
Change noun form
railways
show examples
fees.
To conclude
,
although
many issues make banning privately owned vehicles a difficult measure, I believe that the authorities should create programs that would benefit both the commuters and the urban area’s infrastructure.
Submitted by cerasela.balanescu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Response
Ensure to provide a clear stance on the issue in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion
Try to connect your ideas more smoothly with appropriate transition words and phrases.
Coherence and Cohesion
Good use of examples to support your arguments.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion
  • privately owned vehicles
  • ban
  • city centers
  • traffic congestion
  • air pollution
  • noise levels
  • urban environment
  • public transport
  • environmentally friendly
  • healthier lifestyle
  • commuting
  • congestion charges
  • peak times
  • environment-friendly vehicles
What to do next:
Look at other essays: