Increasing price of the petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures that you think might be effective ?

It is sometimes argued that raising the

cost

of fossil fuel is the most effective solution for environmental and problems on the roads these days. While I agree that

this

method is extremely successful in decreasing the

amount

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of exhaust fumes that were emitted and the number of traffic congestion, I believe that there are other possible measures that have similar results. There are various reasons why raising the price of energy resource is considered to be a superior measure.

To begin

with, excessive exhaust fumes is the main factor that contributes to pollution and environment degradation.

Therefore

, escalating the price of renewable power could directly discourage citizens from purchasing and using private transports regularly.

Consequently

, not only the

quantity

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of personal vehicles but

also

the amount of carbon dioxide will experience a decline,

hence

alleviate the pollution issue.

Furthermore

, the higher

cost

of the resource, the

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

residents driving their means of transport since the travelling

cost

by cars is significantly more than buses or trains,

thus

reduce traffic problems.

For example

,

instead

of spending 30 dollars on fuels, people are likely to pay 6 dollars

for

Verify preposition usage

apply

show examples

to travel by public transport

such

as train in order to save money. Despite the above arguments, I believe that there are other solutions that share similar effects.

Firstly

, the administration should introduce a regulation that declines the ticket

cost

to entice citizens into public transports. In fact,

this

method when coped with the growth of energy price could hinder the individuals from using personal vehicles effectively, results in the pollutant and traffic issues depletion.

Secondly

, the government can invest in researching an alternative renewable supply that could benefit the environment.

For instance

, hydropower, water or wind resources are expected

Add the particle

to

show examples

be equivalent in productivity and fewer carbon dioxide

emmision

Correct your spelling

emission

emissions

compared to gasoline. As a consequence, the threat of fuels consumption as well as pollution can be alleviated. In conclusion, while increasing the nonrenewable energy

cost

is advantageous for certain reasons, I do not believe that it is the only method that could benefit the environment and decrease

on

Verify preposition usage

apply

show examples

road congestion.