In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result, in order to modernize, old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings. What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The modern cities are continuously changing since lifestyle has evolved into a new concept where the people move to the big cities to get a job and to have more

further

opportunities.

Moreover

, the students move to

this

megalopolis to study in a well-known and high teaching university.

Therefore

, these working-cities are becoming overpopulated and new places need to be built to supply to foreign people. Where the space is not available, the municipality has to wreck old buildings and create a modern version of them.

Firstly

, I would explain

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

several drawbacks for the demolition. Old structures bring with them the tory, arts and culture.

For example

, if the colosseum goes down the Rome wouldn't be the same

city

. It takes over a huge history on how it was built, for what purpose and how it works.

Thus

, the cultural part would be the major disadvantage to get down old structures.

Additionally

, the beauty of a

city

would dramatically get worse. From my personal experience, if you take a walk in Vienna it will charm you for the extraordinary old style. While, in Washington DC, as a new

city

, the modern structures are not facing at all. In conclusion, the negative aspects overcome the positive ones and the government should not think about creating new housing for foreign people while the reason why they go there. As I mentioned above, a major of moving is due to

w

Add an article

the

show examples

orking position.

Thus

, I would encourage the government to try to spread the company among the country and give them a financial reason to move away from the

city

, keeping the beautiful old building where they are.