Some people think the government should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other aspects of public transport such as cost and environment. Discuss both view and give your opinion?

Some people think the government should spend money on faster means of public

transport

.

However

, others think money should be spent on other aspects of public

transport

such

as cost and environment. Discuss both

view

Change to a plural noun

views

show examples

and give your opinion? In today’s world,

traffic

problems have always attracted a great deal of attention from the public. While some argue that public transports should be re-engineered to travel at greater speed, it is my firm conviction that the idea of other more pressing aspects

such

as their fares or environmental responsibility being prioritized is more favourable. It is understandable why some focus on the speed of

such

public means of

transport

. The

first

reason is that a boost of velocity made for

such

vehicles would result in improved connectivity between urban and rural areas, which may lead to more occupational opportunities for rural inhabitants. Since the commuting time is greatly reduced, they are more motivated to seek jobs in nearby cities.

Moreover

, given the exponential rate of urbanization, the conditions of existing

traffic

infrastructures may

proves

Change the verb form

prove

show examples

themselves to be inadequate for accommodating

such

expansion. In fact, roads, especially in developing countries, are generally narrow, which directs the public to blame the bulkiness of public transports for

traffic

congestion.

Therefore

, an effective solution to

such

impediment seems to be that these means of

transport

being upgraded to move at a greater pace in order to free public space of

further

breakdowns.

However

, I believe that the national budget should be spent on reducing the fares and environmental impacts of public transports due to their long-term benefits. If the cost of travelling by

such

vehicles is substantially or totally covered by the states, citizens will probably feel more encouraged to adopt a habit of using public transports.

This

would result in not only personal lifestyle lift, but

also

an improved state of

traffic

as a whole. An increase in the number of people using buses or trains as their prime means of transports will lead to more

traffic

space being optimized.

Moreover

, since urban planners have recently been in favour of sustainable development given the context of pollution, reducing the impact of public transports on the environment is a

timely

Replace the word

time

show examples

adjustment.

However

,

this

suggestion would not be made possible if some drawbacks characterized by clean energy

such

as inconsistency and intermittence are not addressed.

Therefore

, the government should allocate subsidies to make renewable energy reliable enough to power public vehicles and

thus

reduce exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere. In conclusion, there are still some justifications for spending public funding on maximizing the speed of public transports;

however

, I am more inclined to the idea suggesting that

such

money be channelled to cutting down the fees and reducing the adverse impacts on the air quality of

such

means of transports.